Don’t they need guns to enforce these new laws if they ever go into fruition? Its pretty hypocritical since the blue shield is almost ensure a corrupt police force.
Related posts:
- Who has stricter gun laws Texas or Michigan?
- Do you believe stricter gun laws reduce violent crime despite this:?
- Folks, why do cities with the most gun laws have the highest crime rates?
- Does the Virgina Tech incident highlight the incompetence of our police force to act as a security force?
- Who has stricter gun laws Texas or Michigan?
- How does law enforcement feel about conceal and carry permits for non-law enforcement citizens?
- How will liberals protect stricter gun laws and enforcement?
- If liberals take the Senate, how soon will Ted Kennedy's "Brady II" bill reappear?
- What is the heck is wrong with stricter gun control laws?
- Who out there in Answer-land would like to see stricter gun laws?
Thats why you need to buy all the guns now, and all the ammo, to drive up the price and create a stimulus in the american firearms industry, seriously the only thing they’ve talked about is renewing the assualt gun ban…which did nothing, you could still buy whatever you wanted, just limited manufacture of certain things, which there are already a ton of, or they will just import and say it was built before the ban. I mean seriously stop raising the price of my ammo its ticking me off.
There’s been no legislation since the new President took office nor is there any hint toward any.
for people that live in peaceful countries where people dont get shot up all the time – our police dont even carry guns, the american love affair with clint eastwood seems so silly (and dangerous)
protect? I’m all for tighter gun laws and stricter enforcement. "the blue shield is almost ensure a corrupt police force."… that broad claim doesn’t even make sense.
You realize there are hundreds of forces across the country right?