2011 SHOT Show floor footage from CAA, Command Arms Accessories, featuring their RONI pistol to carbine conversion system, their new polymer magazines, and their AR accessories.
Due to YouTube’s recent censorship activities we highly suggest you Subscribe to our channel on Full30:
The ATF has decided to Ban XM855/ SS109, Military Surplus ammunition commonly used in AR-15 style rifles and pistols. This is on the grounds that it (green tip) is armor piercing and will defeat vests commonly worn by law enforcement officers. IF you don’t do something right now they will just keep ratcheting up their efforts.
Proposed change: http://www.atf.gov/sites/default/files/assets/Library/Notices/atf_framework_for_determining_whether_certain_projectiles_are_primarily_intended_for_sporting_purposes.pdf
CONTACT THE BATFE:
ATF email: APAComments@atf.gov
Fax: (202) 648-9741
Mail: Denise Brown, Mailstop 6N-602, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Enforcement Programs and Services, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 99 New York Avenue, NE, Washington, DC 20226: ATTN: AP Ammo Comments.
CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES:
***I had to remove the petition link because that’s all people were doing is signing the petition which doesn’t really help us in this fight***
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to voice strong opposition to the proposed change to current law that would make it illegal to manufacture, import or sell on the open market M855 / SS109 ammunition.
The claimed purpose of this change is to “protect the lives and safety of law enforcement officers from the threat posed by ammunition capable of penetrating a protective vest when fired from a handgun”.
As the Technical Branch well knows, all rifle ammunition of a common caliber such as .223 / 5.56 is capable of penetrating threat level IIA and IIIA body armor regardless of the firearm that is used to fire it. M855 / SS109 is no more of a threat to law enforcement than M193 or Hornady VMAX loads are.
It’s also worth noting that rifle caliber pistols are rarely used in violent crime, their usage is a statistical zero for all practical purposes, which further begs the question as to why this proposed rule change is even being considered.
Banning the availability of affordable surplus ammunition under the false pretense that it’s in the name of officer safety is a direct violation of our 2nd Amendment rights. To reiterate, it is clear that this proposed change places an unreasonable restriction on law abiding citizens that will have unintended consequences and will further negatively impact our ability to exercise freedoms guaranteed to us by Constitution of the United States.
Thank you for your time and consideration,
CITY / STATE
Military arms channel video:
Visit our friends: http://vsomedia.org/our-friends I apologize to everyone who came to this box for information. We used to have beautifully written description boxes full of links, attributions, discounts, ect. Through the political unraveling of YouTube much damage has been done to the information contained in this box through bulk actions. Please consider contacting us directly if info is missing. This includes music attributions. We have always worked to make it transparent who’s work we are using to enhance ours. Unfortunately much of this data was lost. If you find your work integrated into one of our videos without attribution, please send me an email and I will add it back immediately .
Unless otherwise stated, the subject matter of this video was provided by the manufacturer or another third party at no cost to us. In doing so, VSO reserves all creative rights, including the right to publish negative aspects it deems relevant to the representation of the product and its continuous improvement. VSO only publishes objective content related directly to tests performed by its personnel. While in-depth test results may be shared directly with manufacturers prior to official release, they must agree NOT to: impede VSO’s work, attempt to undermine or alter our results, impugn or undermine our integrity, and must forfeit any expectation of being involved in the process. To be clear to our viewers, VSO provides testing, evaluation, research, and product development consulting services to clients, for which it is compensated. It is solely at VSO’s discretion whether or not to publish video derived from such tests and experience with these products. These are separate-No party may buy our opinion & No party may buy access to our audience.
If you are interested in VSO’s services you may submit an official inquiry via email to info AT VSOMedia DOT org