What were the four main issues that cost the Dems congress in 1994?

Nothing has changed since then, they still stand where they did then, so has Amerca forgotten; increasing taxes, fascist gun control policy, secretive socialist healthcare policy and Clinton far-left leanings.

This scenario has probably played out already. A call from New York is placed to a known terrorist in Iran who is suspected of trying to bring a "dirty bomb" to the city. A terrorist plot is happening. Should the government intercept that call or wait until the paperwork is filed?

Republicans will say "just do it, act immediately. Thousands of American lives are at stake."

The Democrats will say "No. You have to get a court warrant even if there is a plot to bomb NYC, and don’t forget to Mirandize them first." The Democrats are wrong; on terror and on taxes, the great strength of todays economy proves it. The Democrats are wrong for our freedom and liberty.

Nothing has changed since 1993, why would it, 80% of them that were in the Senate then are still there.

Be sure to read the comments, you will find more information about gun control act

Isn't Guiliani being hypocritical about the Democrats wanting a "nanny government"?

After all didn’t Guiliani support the Patriot Act and hand gun control while Mayor of NYC? Those are two prime examples of the government "controlling your life."

What is his position on the seatbelt and helmet laws?

Does he intend to get rid of that nanny government legislation if he is elected President?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070730/ap_on_el_pr/giuliani_democrats

Be sure to read the comments, you will find more information about gun control act

Will next Prohibition be about guns instead of liquor?

In the early part of the last century, the nation tried to ban alcohol. The result was speakeasy’s, rum runners, bad liquor, and organized crime.

In this new century, an Obama Administration along with the Democrats in Congress might try to "effectively" ban firearms ownership through heavy regulation, ammunition taxes, and mandatory federal licensing of gun owners.

If this comes to pass, could there be a new Prohibition Era based upon guns instead of liquor? "Gun" Runners instead of "Rum" Runners?
To FireBug below,

The Fed’s don’t outright ban guns, but the enact so much petty and hindering legislation to make it a P.I.T.A. to own a gun that some folks just give up.

Example: If they pass a 100% ammunition tax, that’d drive away a lot of the casual shooters; it’d just become too expensive.

Same with federal licensing. Many folks might refuse to obtain a federal license or pay some outrageous fee for one, and therefore just give up on being gun owners.

It is the strategy of incremental legislation the anti-gun crowd uses to slowly, and eventually completely, erode our gun rights.

Be sure to read the comments, you will find more information about federal firearms license

Which party has actually protected your Constitutional Rights, The Republicans or the Democrats?

Keep in mind the Patriot Act, FISA, the Military Commissions Act and the new bill introduced by Senator Lieberman and 4 Republicans and the 2 repeals of Gun Control laws by Democrats in the last year.

Put aside all the Rhetoric and show proof :

Which party has actually protected your Constitutional Rights, The Republicans or The Democrats?

How are these 2 things different?

Republicans feel safety > freedom…………..
so they support the patriot act in violation of the constitution’s 4th amendment.

Democrats feel safety > freedom…………….
so they support gun control in violation of the 2nd amendment.

Look, I happen to agree that safety is the number 1 priority.

I support both the patriot act and gun control.

The constitution is subject to loose interpretation.

but why do both sides accuse the other of sacrificing freedom for safety………………
when they are guilty of doing it themselves?
edit: Criminals have been caught thousands of times trying to buy guns legally.
Outlawing guns won’t stop them from getting guns entirely, but it would significantly decrease the quantity of criminals getting guns.
and it is much easier to kill someone with a gun than with a knife.
You can shoot someone from a mile away with a gun….
but with a knife, you need to get up close to the victim, in which case the victim might be able to fight back.

« Older Entries