Do you support Bill Hr45 as Introduced in House: Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009?

Obama’s Congress is now starting on the firearms confiscation bill. If it passes, gun owners will become criminals if you don’t fully comply.
Basically this would make it illegal to own a firearm – any rifle with a clip or ANY pistol unless:

-It is registered -You are fingerprinted -You supply a current Driver’s License -You supply your Social Security # -You will submit to a physical & mental evaluation at any time of their choosing -Each update – change of ownership through private or public sale must be reported and costs – Failure to do so you automatically lose the right to own a firearm and are subject up to a year in jail. -There is a child provision clause on page 16 section 305 stating a child-access provision. Gun must be locked and inaccessible to any child under 18. -They would have the right to come into (your home anytime) and inspect that you are storing your gun safely.

If you think this is a joke – go to the website and take your pick of many opt- ions to read this.

Be sure to read the comments, you will find more information about Firearm Licence

Which case: New York v US or Printz v US will the Con controlled Supreme Court cite to strike down Obamacare?

In the 1990s, the Supreme Court shocked the legal world by striking down two laws for violating the Tenth Amendment. The first was New York v. United States in 1992, where the Court struck down a federal law requiring states to pass state laws for the disposal of radioactive waste, and to issue regulations for implementing those laws. Then in Printz v. United States in 1997, the Court struck down a provision of the Brady Act—a federal gun-control law—that required state and local law enforcement to run background checks on handgun purchasers.

From these two cases emerged the anti-commandeering principle, holding that the Tenth Amendment forbids the federal government from commandeering—or ordering—any branch of state government to do anything. The states are sovereign and answer only to their voters, not to Washington, D.C.

http://imkane.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/unconstitutional-obamacare-violates-tenth-amendment-anti-commandeering-principle/

Be sure to read the comments, you will find more information about gun control act

Does the Federal Loophole still exist? I believe it does… but I am not certain…?

I am wondering if the Federal Firearms Law(s, there are many) Loophole which states (and this may be pieced together from different laws, but I believe this is true:)

"Sales or Transfers of Firearms between Private Individuals that are not Licensed FFL Holders, namely those that are not Actively Engaged in the Business of selling or dealing firearms, may transfer or sell a firearm to a Private Individual that is not an FFL holder that is also not Actively Engaged in the Business with no provision of a record check required."

This, I believe, is what got a lot of people in an uproar because the idea was that "Anyone can go to a Gun Show and buy whatever they want." The reality is, however, that 95% of the people at a Gun Show are licensed FFL holders, and ATF and Police are there to enforce those sales, and process Form 4437 for those sales from FFLs….

… However, gun people also pointed out that making laws for Gun Shows was silly, since the above "Cash-and-carry Private Non-FFL Citizen to Private Non-FFL Citizen" sales were legal in the parking lot.

I want to know if this loophole is still in effect. If it is, I have a ray of light for my situation, and have a way to (as legally as possible) achieve my goal of my 2nd Amendment Right, without breaking (one of the) Federal laws. There are many, but as far as I know, this clause has not yet been closed.

I also wondered at one point if it only applied to sales of Long guns… I know someone knows the answer to that too.

Thanks, I surely do appreciate the info.

PS: I am asking so that I can be as informed as possible, some of you know my previous posts. I am not the type to give up. Thanks.
* Added info, 2 minutes ago: This info is directed to John T. Mr. John T, I tried to mail you but you do not allow that…

I thank you for reading my other posts. I am glad you understand what I am getting that. I even tried to allude to it in my posts that there are different Federal laws, and that this one I have questioned is how I will have to obtain my weapon. I do also know that getting caught with it is my butt. I thank you for seing this, and I wanted you to know I appreciate your, the first poster’s, and all the other person’s info.

I must wrap it up with this: NJ is trying to remove the rights of people -nationwide- to own firearms. I can not let my rights be stramrolled. I have joined the NRA today, and will be pursuing expungement, rights restored, and a possible Constitutional challenge to the gun laws of NJ. As far as me possessing a Firearm, I am about to go to a Gun Show in Texas. It appears I do not even need ID for the private sales.

& No Loophole. I am pro-gun. JC